This exam is closed book, no books, papers or recording devices permitted. You may use theorems from class, or the book, provided you can recall them correctly.
With short solutions and comments. I hope I did not damage too many delicate egos with this final!
Suppose
and
for all
Show that
for all
with
implies that
almost everywhere with
respect to Lebesgue measure.
Generally well done.
Ans:- From a standard result, a.e. in
for every
The subset of
on which
is therefore the union of a countable collection of sets of
measure zero, so also of measure zero. Hence
almost everywhere in
Suppose is a bounded and self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space
show that if
for all
then
Only one person got this right. I did not say compact, so you cannot use the spectral theory of compact operators. No, all bounded operators are not compact etc.
Ans:- For any expanding using sesquilinearity (and linearity of
gives
![]() |
Give an example of an element of
which is not the Fourier
transform of an element of
Of course, I confused people by giving a harder version of this on the practice final.
Ans. If the Fourier transform of
is in
then it
must be the inverse Fourier transform of an
function, hence
continuous. Thus it suffices to find an
function which is not
continuous, say the characteristic function of
If
show that
Generally well done although quite a few people tried to use Fourier series.
Ans:- By the translation-invariance of Lebesgue measure and countable
additivity, the terms,
for
in the
series satisfy
![]() |
Show that there is no function
satisfying
Mostly people got this one.
Ans:- If there is such a function its real part also satisfies the
condition, so we can assume it is real. Then the integral in
() is
times the imaginary part of the
th Fourier
coefficient, thus
which series diverges, violating
Bessel's inequality.
Show that the function
is in
and
that its Fourier transform is infinitely differentiable. Is
a
Schwartz function?
Many people thought this function was Schwartz, it is not infinitely differentiable and that is one of the requirements!
Ans: Certainly
and we know (if you like from class)
that
for every
Since follows
that
is continuous for every
No, it is
not Schwartz.
Suppose
is such that
and
the Fourier transform is such that
Show that there exists a function
such that
Many people got this one at least more-or-less right. However, many of the arguments to justify the integration by parts were dubious to say the least.
Ans:- Since
is given, we only need to find
satisfying
If
show that
One can argue directly as I did in the practice exam and show that has
equismall tail with respect to the Fourier basis when
Or
Ans:- If one sets
when
and zero
otherwise one gets a function in
sucht that
![]() |
Show that there exists an element
which has
but
for every
Rather a lot of wild things said here.
Ans:- If
then its Fourier transform is
Schwartz and conversely. We also know that
![]() |
Richard B. Melrose 2004-05-24