|
||
|
||
|
We illustrate the proof in the case that s-sj consists of two kinds of terms: those that decrease by a factor c when j increases by 1, and those that decrease by a smaller factor, d (1 > c > d >0.). Similar argument applies in general.
We then have
sj -s = Acj + Bd j
and
tj -s = sj / (1 - c) - sj -1 c / (1 - c)-s = (sj -s) / (1 - c) - sj -1 c / (1 - c) = B(d - c)d j-1
which decreases by a factor d as j increases by 1.
Thus our trick kills off the term in sj that declines most slowly as j increases.