### Upcoming talks

The seminar will meet Tuesdays at 3:30pm in 4-257
unless otherwise noted.

11.27.12:

Jesse Wolfson (

Northwestern).

The Structure of Smooth Higher Bundles.

We study principal bundles for strict Lie n-groups over simplicial manifolds. Given a Lie group G, one can construct a principal G-bundle on a manifold M by taking a cover U of M, specifying a transition cocycle, and then quotienting U x G by the equivalence relation generated by the cocycle. We demonstrate the existence of an analogous construction for arbitrary strict Lie n-groups. As an application, we show how our construction leads to a simple finite dimensional model of the Lie 2-group String(n).
Note: this talk will be at 4pm.

11.13.12:

Luis (

MIT).

The Goodwillie tower of the identity in $Alg_{\mathcal{O}}(Sp)$ (with a side helping of general context for Goodwillie Cauculus).

The main goal of this talk will be to show that the Goodwillie tower of the identity in $Alg_{\mathcal{O}}(Sp)$, where $\mathcal{O}$ is a spectral operad, is given by the truncation functors
$\mathcal{O}_{\leq n}\circ_{\mathcal{O}}$ (this tower as first by studied by Harper and Hess).
The first part of the talk will provide an overview to a more general context for Goodwillie calculus in model categories (as the treatment by Goodwillie only dealt with the cases of Top and Spec), lightly touching on some of the technical problems that arise.
Then, in the second part, we apply that context to $Alg_{\mathcal{O}}(Sp)$ and, using the fact that the stabilization of $Alg_{\mathcal{O}}$ is $Mod_{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, show that indeed the Harper-Hess tower is the Goodwillie tower.

10.30.12:

Jay Shah (

MIT).

$E_\infty$ ring spaces and spectra.

We define $E_\infty$ ring spaces and $E_\infty$ ring spectra operadically and discuss the relation between the two categories. We then explain how to obtain $E_\infty$ ring spaces from bipermutative categories.

10.16.12:

Rune Haugseng (

MIT).

$\infty$-categories and $\infty$-operads.

I will attempt to give a gentle introduction to $\infty$-categories, and introduce the notion of a monoidal $\infty$-category. Time permitting, I will then try to explain how to generalize these to get $\infty$-operads. The talk will contain at least one joke, and a large number of infinity-symbols.

### Past seminars

10.2.12:

Jeremy Hahn (

MIT).

Quasi-$\omega$-categories.

You may have heard the buzz about quasi-categories, which are homotopical versions of ordinary categories. Just as the collection of ordinary categories should be arranged into a 2-category, the collection of quasi-categories should form a quasi-2-category. Continuing, the collection of quasi-2-categories should form a quasi-3-category, etc. etc. In this talk, we will define quasi-$\omega$-categories, of which quasi-$n$-categories are examples, and if time permits we will construct the quasi-$\omega$-category of quasi-$\omega$-categories.

09.18.12:

Michael Andrews (

MIT).

The Goodwillie tower and the EHP sequence.

I will talk about Mark Behren's work on the Goodwillie tower and
the EHP sequence. Calculating the homotopy groups of spheres at the prime 2 is the most important question in algebraic topology (for me). In 1937 Freudenthal proved the suspension theorem, which shows that many of the homotopy groups of spheres are stable. Using techniques such as the Adams spectral sequence, people have managed to compute the stable homotopy groups of spheres in an impressively large range. Mark shows that we can use a sound understanding of the stable groups to compute the unstable groups. In particular, there is a transfinite spectral sequence from the stable homotopy groups of spheres to the stable homotopy groups of
spheres (inception?!), which when truncated gives the unstable groups (minus resolving some extension problems). I will try my hardest to make the talk accessible to those with a fear of spectral sequences and I will recap what the EHP sequence and the Goodwillie tower are before using them!

05.08.12:

Dustin Clausen(

MIT).

???.

05.01.12:

Luis Pereira (

MIT).

A Cartesian Presentation of Weak $n$-categories.

In this talk we will discuss Rezk's proposed model for the model category of $(\infty,n)$-category types (and, more generally, $(n+k,n)$-categories), which has the particularly nice property of being cartesian closed, hence making easy the task of defining the correct $(\infty,n)$-category of maps between two $(\infty,n)$-categories.
We'll cover (and motivate) his definitions, as well as sketch the proof of cartesian closedness.

04.10.12:

Michael Donovan (

MIT).

The EHP spectral sequence.

We'll go further into last week's discussion of the EHP fibre sequence,
and make some computations in the resulting spectral sequence.

03.20.12:

Michael Andrews (

MIT).

The 2-primary exponent theorem.

We will prove the 2-primary exponent theorem of James: 4^n annihilates the
2-primary components of \pi_k(S^{2n+1}) for all k>2n+1. The tools used to
prove this result are fairly basic and this talk should be comprehensible
to anyone who took 18.906. There is an analogous result for odd primes;
different techniques are required for the even prime because S^{2n+1}
localised at 2 is not necessarily an H-space. In particular, we'll make use
of Samelson products and the Hilton-Milnor theorem, which gives a beautiful
decomposition of \Omega\Sigma(X v Y) for connected spaces X and Y.

03.13.12:

Po Hu (

Wayne State).

Topological Hermitian cobordism.

This is a Tuesday talk of the Topology seminar.

03.06.12:

Saul Glasman (

MIT).

What are the points of Spec S?.

In this talk, I'll attempt to give non-platitudinous answers to some or any of the following questions: is an "affine derived scheme" anything more than a commutative ring spectrum doing a headstand? What is algebra? What are the points of Spec S? Is the homotopy category good for anything? What are the points of Spec R? What is a ring? How much can we inflate the word Spec before it explodes anyway? etc. etc.

02.28.12:

Geoffroy Horel (

MIT).

String Topology.

In 1999, Chas and Sullivan constructed a product on the homology of the free loops on an oriented manifold that looks very similar to the intersection product. Moreover they extended this product to a Gerstenhaber (and even BV) structure. This structure became much clearer with work of Cohen and Jones showing that the Hochschild cochains of the singular cochains of M were quasi-isomorphic to the chains on the Thom spectrum LM^{-TM}. Dwyer Miller and Klein extended this further by showing that LM^{-TM} was actually the topological Hochschild cohomology of the infinite suspension of based loops on M. The talk will be about Cohen and Jones result. All necessary background will be provided.

12.06.11:

Olga Stroilova (

MIT).

Level structures and automorphisms.

The generalized character map of HKR can be rephrased as saying
that the connected p-divisible group corresponding to the universal
formal group law over Morava E_n becomes constant over an appropriate
extension, L, of E_n. Here L is a colimit of inverted Drinfel'd rings
of level structures.
This ring L remembers E_n: it is faithfully flat over p^{-1}
E_n; furthermore, p^{-1} E_n can be recovered from L by takinginvariants with respect to a naturally occurring group action.
I will talk about this story and ask how it might be generalized to an
intermediate setting.

11.29.11:

Luis Pereira (

MIT).

Koszul duality of E_n operads.

One remarkable property of the $E_n$ operads is their apparent self-duality: it would seem that the Koszul dual of the $E_n$ operad is a $-n$ shifted version of itself. This is first suggested by examining the corresponding homology operad, which looks like an amalgamation of the commutative operad with the ($n-1$ shifted) Lie operad. A first proof at this (homology) level was first found by Getzler and Jones, with a much more recent proof at the chain complex level having been found by Fresse. A full proof at the most general level (Spaces/Spectra) seems however not to have yet been found.
In this talk we will, after defining the relevant concepts, discuss Getzler and Jones proof, which uses interesting compact models for the $E_n$ operads known as the Fulton McPherson operads, and, time permiting (and contigent on the speakers ability to both understand and be enlightning about them), the main ideas behind Fresse's more recent result.

11.15.11:

Dustin Clausen (

MIT).

The K(1)-local logarithm.

Sometimes a commutative ring R carries a ``logarithm'' map from the units
in R to the underlying additive group of R. In the case we'll be concerned
with, R is a K(1)-local commutative ring spectrum, and the existence of
such a logarithm follows abstractly from the Bousfield-Kuhn functor. A
priori this log is pretty opaque from a practical standpoint, but Rezk
managed to find a formula for it as an infinite series. This talk is about
Rezk's formula. Or I guess you could say it's about how Bott periodicity
manages to magically produce the p-adic logarithm and other interesting
series besides.

11.08.11:

Saul Glasman (

MIT).

Crystalline Cohomology.

Crystalline cohomology is the first robust headspace in which one can understand
the p-torsion in the cohomology of a variety over a field of characteristic p,
patching a notorious puncture in the great bicycle tyre that is Weil cohomology.
I'll begin by laying out a manifesto which states what we want to achieve, and
I'll go on to sketch an achievement of it, whose vivid chapters include the
functoriality of the crystalline topos and the isomorphism with de Rham
cohomology. If permitted by (i) time and (ii) the quantity of knowledge I can
guzzle in the next twenty-four hours, I'll serve a portion of the magnificent de
Rham-Witt complex, which explicitly computes crystalline cohomology.

11.01.11:

Rune
Haugseng (

MIT).

A Spectral Sequence for the Cohomology of an Infinite Loop
Space.

Taking the infinite loop spaces of the mod-2
Adams tower of a
spectrum gives a spectral sequence converging to the cohomology of the
infinite loop space of the spectrum, whose E_2-term can be identified with
certain algebraic derived functors. I'll explain how to set this up, then
say something about the computation of these derived functors.

10.25.11:

Tomer Schlank (

Hebrew University, Jerusalem).

A Projective Model Structure on Pro-categories , and the Relative
\'Etale Homotopy Type.

Isaksen showed that a proper model category
$C$, induces a model structure
on the pro-category $Pro(C)$.
In this talk I will present a new method for defining a model structure on
the pro-category $Pro(C)$. This method requires $C$ to satisfy a much
weaker condition then having a model structure. The main application will be
a novel model structure on pro-simplicial sheaves. We see that in this
model structure a "topological lift" of Artin and Mazur's \'Etale homotopy
type is naturally obtained as an application of some natural derived functor
to the terminal object of the \'etale topos. This definition can be
naturally generalized to a relative setting, namely- given a map of topoi T
\to S, we get a notion of a relative homtopy type of T over S which is a
Pro-simplicial object in S.
This definition turns out to be useful for the study of rational points on
algebraic varieties.
This is a joint work with Ilan Barnea

10.18.11:

Geoffroy
Horel (

MIT).

Topological Hochschild Homology.

In this talk we will give an overview
of THH (Topological Hochschild Homology) which is the analogue in the category
of spectra of good-old Hochschild homology for associative algebra over field.
We will give two different construction of THH. The first one through the cyclic
bar construction has the advantage of being a straightforward generalization of
the algebraic version. The second one through factorization homology is more
interesting as it describes THH as an example inside a large family of
constructions indexed by framed manifolds.
Finally if time permits we will introduce the Bockstedt spectral sequence and
make an explicit computation of THH(KU).

Please send mailing list requests and questions
to Michael Andrews.

Other useful links: