Problem set 6

Due November 16, 2004. Problems from notes:- 61, 62, plus the following two problems also at the end of the problems in the notes as numbers 75, 76.

Restriction from Sobolev spaces. The Sobolev embedding theorem shows that a function in $ H^m(\mathbb{R}^n),$ for $ m>n/2$ is continuous - and hence can be restricted to a subspace of $ \mathbb{R}^n.$ In fact this works more generally. Show that there is a well defined restriction map

$\displaystyle H^m(\mathbb{R}^n)\longrightarrow H^{m-\frac12}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ if $\displaystyle m>\frac12$ (8)

with the following properties:
  1. On $ \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ it is given by $ u\longmapsto u(0,x'),$ $ x'\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}.$
  2. It is continuous and linear.
Hint: Use the usual method of finding a weak version of the map on smooth Schwartz functions; namely show that in terms of the Fourier transforms on $ \mathbb{R}^n$ and $ \mathbb{R}^{n-1}$

$\displaystyle \widehat{u(0,\cdot)}(\xi')=(2\pi)^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}\hat u(\xi_1,\xi')d\xi_1,\ \forall\ \xi '\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}.$ (9)

Use Cauchy's inequality to show that this is continuous as a map on Sobolev spaces as indicated and then the density of $ \mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ in $ H^m(\mathbb{R}^n)$ to conclude that the map is well-defined and unique.

Restriction by WF: From class we know that the product of two distributions, one with compact support, is defined provided they have no `opposite' directions in their wavefront set:

$\displaystyle (x,\omega )\in\operatorname{WF}(u)\Longrightarrow (x,-\omega )\notin\operatorname{WF}(v)$ then  $\displaystyle uv\in\mathcal{C}^{-\infty}_{\text{c}}(\mathbb{R}^n).$ (10)

Show that this product has the property that $ f(uv)=(fu)v=u(fv)$ if $ f\in\mathcal{C}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^n).$ Use this to define a restriction map to $ x_1=0$ for distributions of compact support satisfying $ ((0,x'),(\omega
_1,0))\notin\operatorname{WF}(u)$ as the product

$\displaystyle u_0=u\delta (x_1).$ (11)

[Show that $ u_0(f),$ $ f\in\mathcal{C}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ only depends on $ f(0,\cdot)\in\mathcal{C}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{n-1}).$

Richard B. Melrose 2004-12-19